| Author | Message | 
| wertz Member
 
  
 
  
 Joined: Feb 02, 2010
 Posts: 26
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:02 am |     |  
| Assisst me at what all instance i should use high beam light.
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| myownworld Site Admin
 
  
 
  
 Joined: Jan 06, 2010
 Posts: 485
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:15 am |     |  
| I only use full beam headlights at night on a motorway, with no traffic coming in front. Dipped headlights are normal running lights, unless you want to blind the poor guy coming towards you!
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| Misha Site Owner
 
 
  
 Joined: Aug 02, 2006
 Posts: 705
 Location: McLean, VA, USA
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:19 am |     |  
| Quite right MOW, thanks for answering this.
   
 Also, it's a good idea to show courtesy to the drivers traveling in the same direction with you in front of you. I am sure you are switching to low beam when you are getting closer to them, just wanted to articulate this for others
  |  
|  |  | 
|       | 
|  | 
| myownworld Site Admin
 
  
 
  
 Joined: Jan 06, 2010
 Posts: 485
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:27 am |     |  
| thanks darling...!
  see, I DO know something about driving unlike what hubby thinks....   And yes, I agree that this is more a matter of courtesy than anything else, and it's certainly not very nice when someone comes flashing full beam towards you...!
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| Misha Site Owner
 
 
  
 Joined: Aug 02, 2006
 Posts: 705
 Location: McLean, VA, USA
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:55 am |     |  
| Oh yeah! And towards your back either, that was my point. But then they might want to see your back better, don't they?
  |  
|  |  | 
|       | 
|  | 
| myownworld Site Admin
 
  
 
  
 Joined: Jan 06, 2010
 Posts: 485
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:05 am |     |  
| 
  oh I know that feeling alright....you can feel them drilling holes into you from behind....sends shivers up my spine...! Dipped eyes... sorry lights please!! |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| sgtrock21 Seasoned Driver
 
 
  
 Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 Posts: 120
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:41 pm |     |  
| A few years ago when vehicle headlights in the USA were finally allowed to catch up with the rest of the world regarding headlight technology, I experienced some problems being blinded by oncoming lights which were not on high beam. I replaced the bulbs in my 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse with Sylvania Silverstar Ultras. They performed as advertised. I was at first puzzled that I no longer experienced being blinded by oncoming lights. I did a little research and was surprised to learn that light waves of the same frequency colliding directly head on can actually cancel each other. Waves of similar frequency colliding nearly head on can produce a scattering effect. The factory headlights on my 2010 Kia produce the same effect. I almost never use my high beams.
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| Astraist Master Driver
 
 
  
 Joined: Mar 27, 2010
 Posts: 209
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:22 pm |     |  
| 
 | wertz wrote: |  | Assisst me at what all instance i should use high beam light. | 
 
 I cannot believe I didn't see this thread before!
 
 First, let's get rid of the term "high beam." It's not a "high" beam - it's a "full" beam, driving beam or main beam. This contributes that the main beam is the DEFAULT beam for night driving!
 
 Anywhere from near sunset (or even in overcast weather) and to sunrise, even in roads with street lighting - use the full beam. Only dip the full beam if:
 
 1. You might dazzle another road user or pedestrian (dazzle happens within 600 feet).
 
 2. If the road is very well illumanted and you feel like the main beam isn't necessary.
 
 Even in those situations, you can resort to occasional quick flashes of the full beam to illuminate the road without dazzling anyone.
 
 Using the full beam gives you thrince the range, about twice the spread and about ten times more the more clearity in the lighted area. It can also make you more conspicious to other road users and even help light the road for THEM.
 
 Single Carriageway
 In a single carriageway, drive on the full beam and dip once an oncoming driver comes into view (or if you follow another driver closely). When the other driver is about to get past you - undip. Because of the angle, you will not dazzle the other driver, but you will avoid transitioning from the area illuminated by his lights into the darkness.
 
 If you are driving on a dual-carriageway and on the right lane, you can undip even earlier (when your headlamps are about 45 degrees relative to the driver of the other car).
 
 Right-handers
 Keep the full beam on and dip before another driver (or the lights of the other car - if you cannot see the car itself) comes into the area lighted by your lamps across the bend. This method illuminates the bend for the other driver and alrets them to your presence.
 
 Left-handers
 In tight corners, keep to the far end of the lane and keep the full beam on. You should manage to make it across the entire turn without dipping (or dipping momentarily) and without dazzling another driver.
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| sgtrock21 Seasoned Driver
 
 
  
 Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 Posts: 120
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:26 pm |     |  
| Astraist, Please no offense intended I admire your knowledge. Please realise that other people use other terminology. In the USA the common term is "Low Beam/High Beam". Low beams are aimed low. High beams are aimed high. It makes perfect sense to us. These terms are used in our state driving manuals and written driving tests.
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| Misha Site Owner
 
 
  
 Joined: Aug 02, 2006
 Posts: 705
 Location: McLean, VA, USA
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sun Aug 12, 2012 11:18 am |     |  
| Yep, I can confirm it - high/low beam is a proper term on this side of the pond. Nobody will understand you if you say "full beam".
   
 This actually reminds about even funnier situation. Both my former and later wives grew up in the places thousands miles away from the place I grew up. And with both we had a blank stare moments when something that was said did not register with the other side at all. Not many cases, but at least a handful of things had totally different names.
 
 And this is the same country! I can imagine how many language differences are between English speaking countries scattered all over the globe.
  |  
|  |  | 
|       | 
|  | 
| sgtrock21 Seasoned Driver
 
 
  
 Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 Posts: 120
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sun Aug 12, 2012 11:54 am |     |  
| 
 You got me thinking about working on British automobiles and having to translate English/English to American/English. I found this rather comprehensive list.| Misha wrote: |  | And this is the same country! I can imagine how many language differences are between English speaking countries scattered all over the globe.
  | 
 
 Examples of British vs American Automotive Translations
 
 | British Term
 1.	accumulator
 2.	actuator
 3.	Artic (articulated lorry)
 4.	baulk ring
 5.	bonnet
 6.	boot
 7.	bulkhead
 8.	choke tube
 9.	core plug
 10.	crocodile clip
 11.	crosshead
 12.	crown wheel
 13.	cubby box
 14.	damper
 15.	drive shaft
 16.	drophead coupe
 17.	dynamo
 18.	earth
 19.	estate
 20.	fascia
 21.	fixed-head coupe
 22.	Gallon (Imperial)
 23.	gearbox
 24.	hood
 25.	jointing compound
 26.	lorry
 27.	monocoque
 28.	MOT = Ministry of Transport
 29.	nave plate
 30.	nose
 31.	paraffin
 32.	pinking
 33.	prop shaft
 34.	petrol
 35.	prise
 36.	quarterlight
 37.	rev counter
 38.	ring gear
 39.	roadster
 40.	roundabout
 41.	RoStyle
 42.	saloon
 43.	scuttle
 44.	side curtains
 45.	silencer
 46.	sill
 47.	spanner
 48.	squab
 49.	suction advance
 50.	sump
 51.	thrust bearing
 52.	tickover
 53.	top gear
 54.	torch
 55.	trunnion
 56.	Tyre
 57.	wheel nut
 58.	Whitworth
 59.	windscreen
 60.	wing
 
 | American Term
 1.	battery
 2.	switch or servo
 3.	tractor-trailer
 4.	synchro ring
 5.	hood
 6.	trunk
 7.	firewall
 8.	venturi
 9.	freeze plug
 10.	alligator clip
 11.	Phillips
 12.	ring gear
 13.	glove box or glove compartment
 14.	shock absorber
 15.	half shaft or axle shaft
 16.	convertible version of 2 door coupe
 17.	generator
 18.	ground
 19.	station wagon
 20.	dashboard
 21.	2-door coupe
 22.	5 US Quarts
 23.	transmission
 24.	convertible top
 25.	gasket sealant
 26.	truck
 27.	unibody
 28.	DOT = Department of Transportation
 29.	hubcap
 30.	front of car
 31.	kerosene
 32.	knocking or pinging
 33.	drive shaft
 34.	gasoline
 35.	pry
 36.	vent window
 37.	tachometer
 38.	flywheel gear, or starter gear
 39.	car that only comes in a convertible style
 40.	rotary, traffic circle
 41.	type of steel wheel (as opposed to wire)
 42.	2 or 4-door sedan
 43.	cowl
 44.	removable side windows
 45.	muffler
 46.	rocker panel
 47.	wrench
 48.	part of seat
 49.	vacuum advance
 50.	oil pan
 51.	throwout bearing
 52.	idle
 53.	high gear
 54.	flashlight
 55.	sliding or rotating joint (suspension)
 56.	tire
 57.	lug nut
 58.	British thread measuring standard
 59.	windshield
 60.	fender
 
 | 
 |  
| 
 Last edited by sgtrock21 on Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:14 am; edited 1 time in total
 |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| Misha Site Owner
 
 
  
 Joined: Aug 02, 2006
 Posts: 705
 Location: McLean, VA, USA
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:23 pm |     |  
| Thanks SQT, great find. Funny enough it does not have hign beam/full beam
   
 Oh, and I took a freedom to fix the table for you
  |  
|  |  | 
|       | 
|  | 
| sgtrock21 Seasoned Driver
 
 
  
 Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 Posts: 120
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:44 pm |     |  
| 
 Thanks Misha. I had never heard the term "Full Beam" prior to this forum.| Misha wrote: |  | Thanks SQT, great find. Funny enough it does not have hign beam/full beam   
 Oh, and I took a freedom to fix the table for you
  | 
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
| Misha Site Owner
 
 
  
 Joined: Aug 02, 2006
 Posts: 705
 Location: McLean, VA, USA
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:52 pm |     |  
| Me neither - but then I never lived in Israel, so this may be Israeli specific.
 |  
|  |  | 
|       | 
|  | 
| Astraist Master Driver
 
 
  
 Joined: Mar 27, 2010
 Posts: 209
 
 
   | 
|  Posted:
Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:50 pm |     |  
| It's actually an English (i.e. British) term. The Israeli term, obviously in Hebrew, is "Road Beam", but the common expression is "high beam."
 
 Sadly, people fail to use their high beams because of the risk of dazzling another driver and maybe cause they are afraid of what it might do to their gas consumption.
 
 However, the high beams should be the DEFAULT light for night driving! Even many roads that are illuminated still offer poor visibilty. The high beams provide over thrince the range, as well as a bigger width and better clarity inside the luminated area. Also, the high beams can illuminate the road for other road users and en route alert them of your presence - before you get a  chance at dazzling them.
 
 I have trained many drivers who struggled with night driving and night vision, only to find the big shift in simply using the lights more inteligently in order to get a better view.
 
 I even find myself using the high beams to flash into areas besides the road, like into woods or alleys that might conceal a hazard. The usefullness of the high beams at any driving enviornment other than broad daylight - including overcast weather, late evening nights and early morning hours - cannot be stressed enough!
 |  
|  |  | 
|     | 
|  | 
|  |